Other S.L.A.P.P. cases.
|

Barbie SLAPP
About this site
What is a SLAPP?
About Barbie
Mattel's abuse of the courts
Mattel's violation of workers rights
Mattel being really sleazy
Other SLAPP cases
Alternative Barbies
Mattel's links of shame
Report Mattel's abuses
Fight Spam!
Smoking causes Brain damage?
Some humor
Press coverage
Sorehands.com
Mattelabuse
Feedback
Home
| | Mattel is not the only company that uses SLAPP suits. Many other companies use this tactic too.
Robert Novak is silencing critics with a baseless lawsuit. He is using the expense a lawsuit to extort public apologies and placement of banner advertising on the sites of people who complained about bad service. People have said that he plans on going after the BBB for giving him a bad rating too. Unfortunately, the NY anti-SLAPP statute only protects people talking about government dealings. I consider Novak's behavior without honor, without ethics, and just plain scummy. His business might be better if he concentrated on customer service instead of litigation. Carla Virga v. Terminix - Virga complained that Terminix missed over $20,000 of pre-existing damages to a house Terminix supposedly to inspected. Terminix filed a libel lawsuit in California against Virga for libel. After the libel lawsuit was thrown out on a SLAPP motion, Terminix's parent attacked. Service Master filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Virga for using both the Terminix name and the Service Master Name on the site. When Virga defended suit, Service Master dismissed the suit without prejudice. This is similar to what Mattel did to me, when the judge asked Mattel what was libelous, Mattel's attorney moved to dismiss their lawsuit.
The Shops at Willow Bend silences Hank Mishkoff. They went after Hank because he had ShopsAtWillowBend.com, then when he told people about it at TaubmanSucks.com the attorneys shut that down to. NEWS! The appeals court overturned the injunction on Taubmansucks.com
Unicom is going after Chip Rosenthal and his company Unicom Systems Development. This is a classic case of reverse domain name hijacking. Unicom sued Chip, only when he refused to sell them the domain that he had been running since 1990. This is all detailed at http://save.unicom.com NEWS: February 4, 2002. Judge granted summary judgment for Chip which dismisses the case. He had the help of Attorney James S. Tyre. Tyre has been heavily involved in internet freedom. He also has been involved in The Censorware Project, the DeCSS linking case, and Felton v. RIAA.
|
Shop Amazon's Outlet Deals in Computers, Office & Software
Computers,
Another William Silverstein
site. Copyright ©2002-2013 William Silverstein. All rights
reserved.
This site is copyrighted material and its use is subject to
non-exclusive license. If you do not agree to the
terms of this license, leave this site immediately, or
you are bound by the terms of the license. Your use of this site signifies your
agreement to be bound by the terms of this license.
The use of this site is free for personal and non-commercial use - particularly
for those wish to learn about and protect the rights of employees and those who
oppose their abuse by employers and large corporations, but there are
significant fees charged for certain other uses.
This page are the opinions of William Silverstein based on facts and information provided to him.
This is not to be construed as legal advice. Mattel is the manufacturer of Barbie, Matchbox, and Hot Wheels. This site
is neither approved nor endorsed by Mattel. All trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Your use of this site acknowledges that you waive for
yourself, your client, and your employer any and all claim against Silverstein
for any action that relating to this site. If you don't agree to this, leave
this site immediately. Your use of this site signifies your acceptance
of these terms in this paragraph and the terms
of use for the_ site. Assume that any email going to the barbieslapp.com domain will be going to a California resident and
to a fax machine. All e-mail going to this domain is being handled by a
California e-mail service provider using servers in California that prohibit
unsolicited commercial e-mail.